On 7th December 2009, a delegation from FICPI, headed by our President Peter Huntsman, visited the Japanese Patent Office, where the delegation had the chance to talk to Commissioner Hosono, who expressed his interest in the work that FICPI does, especially its educational work in the Asian countries, like the successful SEAD course on patent drafting.
After the meeting with the Commissioner, the FICPI visitors had an opportunity to meet Deputy Commissioner Minami, who advised of his appreciation of the visits from FICPI, and his desire for candid views on the proposals that JPO were putting forward.
The JPO presented statistics showing that, up to 2007, the number of applications filed by foreigners in Japan had increased while the number of applications filed by Japanese had decreased. However, since then, both numbers had been decreasing slightly. In the same two year period, the number of first office actions had increased, tending to reduce the office’s backlog. There had also been a decrease in the number of new requests for examination.
The FICPI visitors were informed that the JPO had made the conditions for patenting medical inventions less severe, meaning that methods for gathering information from the human body are now considered to be patentable inventions, and new dosage and administration regimens for per se known medicines are now considered novel.
Another important change, effective on 29th January 2010, makes it possible to apply for prosecution under the PPH (Patent Prosecution Highway) on the basis of a PCT application examined at one of the Trilateral offices (US, JPO, EPO). It does not matter if the PCT application has claimed priority or not, or where any priority-founding application has been filed. Statistics show that an application taking the PPH route has a much higher chance of getting granted.
The JPO has proposed amendments to the PCT system that contain two major items: the first would delay the ISR (International Search Report) until after the publication of the application, in order to take unpublished, earlier applications into account in the same search, and avoid the need for a later ‘top up’ search. The second would provide for the filing of third party observations. With regard to the first proposal the JPO has determined that in at least 6.5% percent of all applications secret prior art has played a role; in some technical fields this figure was more than 30%. With regard to the second proposal, the JPO saw benefit in reflecting third party observations in the ISR/WOISA.The JPO has invited FICPI to consider these proposals and to provide some feedback. Our members will hear more of these proposals, and FICPI's response, in future days.