APAA-FICPI JOINT SYMPOSIUM
Newport Beach
15-17 March 2002
Presentations
 
  • The FICPI Executive Committee meeting at Newport Beach, California, USA was followed by a two-day APAA/FICPI JOINT SYMPOSIUM.

  • The Symposium was, as usual, in a multi-choice format with a PATENT stream and a TRADEMARK stream and the papers have accordingly been pre-fixed with:
    P1 to P8 for the various Patent stream sessions,
    T2 to T7 for the Trademark stream sessions.

    For a short summary of each of the sessions, see the Symposium Working Program

  • Presentations are either in WORD or POWERPOINT formats.

  • Documents may be downloaded/printed-out SELECTIVELY by clicking on the individual items below. For Papers P5 by Mr Tsai and T7 by Mr Aoki, please contact the authors.

  
Stream Session Title Author Presentation
PATENTS P1 UDPR in Domain Names - A mock arbitration procedure Yoshio Kumakura (JP) MS Word
PATENTS P1 UDPR in Domain Names - A mock arbitration procedure Joseph Reh (USA) Powerpoint
PATENTS P2 Whose skeletons are they anyway? Managing your files for discovery. Francis Ahner (FR) MS Word
PATENTS P2 Whose skeletons are they anyway? Managing your files for discovery. Willem Schuurman (USA) Powerpoint
PATENTS P3 Grace Period and First-to-File Leon Allen (AU) MS Word
PATENTS P3 Grace Period and First-to-File Robert Mitchell (CA) MS Word
PATENTS P4 The novelty of inventive business methods. Is a technical effect necessary for patentability? Man-Gi Pak (Korea) Powerpoint
PATENTS P5 Inventive Steps and Obviousness in Asia, EPO and the USA. A comparison of the criteria for determining Non-obviousness. Julian Crump (GB) MS Word
PATENTS P5 Inventive Steps and Obviousness in Asia, EPO and the USA. A comparison of the criteria for determining Non-obviousness. T.Q.T. Tsai (Taiwan) not available
PATENTS P5 Inventive Steps and Obviousness in Asia, EPO and the USA. A comparison of the criteria for determining Non-obviousness. Maxim Waldbaum (USA) MS Word
PATENTS P6 Revision of the PCT, the EPC and the Community Patent Proposal. Seong-Ki Kim (Korea) Powerpoint
PATENTS P6 Revision of the PCT, the EPC and the Community Patent Proposal. Jan Modin (SE) MS Word
PATENTS P7 Prior Disclosure in Electronic Form. Transient Prior Art. JeongHun Heo (Korea) Powerpoint
PATENTS P7 Prior Disclosure in Electronic Form. Transient Prior Art. Danny Huntington (USA) MS Word
TRADEMARKS T2 Madrid Protocol. An informed view on the merits and difficulties. L.H. de Larramendi (ES) Powerpoint
TRADEMARKS T2 Madrid Protocol. An informed view on the merits and difficulties. Tee-Jim Tan (SG) MS Word
TRADEMARKS T3 Practice before OHIM. The collision of pre-existing rights in a regional system. Andrew Parkes (IE) MS Word
TRADEMARKS T4 Utilising customs for combating counterfeiting. Ms Ella Cheong (HK) Powerpoint
TRADEMARKS T4 Utilising customs for combating counterfeiting. Miguel O'Farrell (AR) Powerpoint
TRADEMARKS T5 Survey and other evidence in Tradenark cases. Douglas Deeth (CA) Powerpoint
TRADEMARKS T6 Contributory infringement in electronic media - The Napster Case. Navin Khanna (CA) Powerpoint
Powerpoint
TRADEMARKS T7 Extraordinary Trademarks - protection of 3D, colour, smell and sound. Hiromichi Aoki (JP) not available
TRADEMARKS T7 Extraordinary Trademarks - protection of 3D, colour, smell and sound. Bruce O'Connor (USA) MS Word
MS Word
Powerpoint
   
back to Archive - summary page
back to Library - summary page		    

 
  last updated: 16 June 2002